Three of D. H. Lawrence’s most important themes are prominent in “The Rocking-Horse Winner”: the corroding effects of acquisitive behavior on English society, the requirement for a truly loving relationship to achieve happiness and fulfillment, and the existence of forces in the natural world that humans might access if they were not limited by social and cultural conventions. These themes structure and inform the narrative, intertwining so that the presentation and development of each theme is connected to the others. Taken together, they offer a view of the philosophical positions that Lawrence worked toward in his most memorable writing.
Lawrence’s father was a coal miner. He made an adequate living, but his wife had aspirations to a more comfortable and refined social setting. Lawrence himself was more concerned with aesthetic and romantic matters than with monetary ones, but as he began to write about British society he became increasingly displeased with what he felt was an economic system that placed an emphasis on things that he felt were not crucial for human well-being. As he wrote in Apocalypse (1931), “What we want is to destroy our false, inorganic connections, especially those related to money,” a sentiment similar to many others that he expressed throughout his life. The advent of World War I forced Lawrence and his wife, who was of German descent, to move away from the Cornwall coast. Lawrence was living at the time primarily on borrowed funds and, in the words of his wife, was “a walking phenomenon of suspended fury.” In addition, as he became a professional author, dependent on the income his writing produced, he was increasingly involved in negotiations regarding remuneration for his work.
Lawrence wrote “The Rocking-Horse Winner” for a collection of ghost stories being compiled by Lady Cynthia Asquith (who was partially the basis for Hester’s character). He was paid fifteen pounds for the story’s English publication rights and fifty pounds for the American rights. To put this payment in perspective, Virginia Woolf in her 1929 “A Room of One’s Own” recommended a sum of five hundred pounds as minimal to secure an artist’s independence. The sums that Paul’s sure winners return, then, are far beyond what would be required to sustain an upper-middle-class family, and enough to place a family within the reaches of “real money,” if not fabulous wealth. The family’s final winnings of more than eighty thousand pounds would be equivalent to several million pounds in the twenty-first century.
Lawrence chose these impressive sums, far beyond what most of his readers could even contemplate, to demonstrate the futility of seeking ever-larger amounts of money in a futile quest for the elusive satisfaction of being rich. The corrosive effects of such a quest are strikingly illustrated by the ultimate sacrifice that Paul makes. The sacrifice is particularly pathetic, since the love he hopes to give his mother cannot be measured in monetary terms. Paul’s death is an indictment of the social circle in London to which Lawrence was peripherally linked as he became a nationally known author. It represents an expression of what critic Sandra Gilbert has called Lawrence’s revulsion at “the city’s staleness, its walking dead, its mechanised ugliness.”
A preoccupation with money was emblematic in Lawrence’s eyes of the obstacles that prevented a man and a woman from joining in a harmonious partnership built on a mutual understanding of each other’s needs. This utopian goal, which Lawrence recognized as difficult and relatively rarely achieved, was one of the central subjects of his work, and in his finest stories he examines and celebrates both the difficulties a couple has in reaching this goal and the ways in which it might become possible.
In “The Rocking-Horse Winner,” Paul’s parents are so completely alienated from each other that the “love” Hester seeks is, unsurprisingly, transferred to her children, especially her only son. This transference is drawn as a parallel to Lawrence’s own relationship with his mother, who was disappointed to a degree in her marriage, which joined two people of dissimilar sensibilities. Lawrence explored the close relationship between Paul Morrell and his mother in his novel Sons and Lovers (1913), and he wrote to a friend shortly after his mother’s death “We have loved each other almost with a husband and wife love, as well as filal and maternal,” a reflection of the deep emotion that Lawrence felt.
Hester “married for love, and the love turned to dust.” Paul’s father, unnamed, is disdainfully depicted as an absent figure, remote and cold. He is not only unsatisfactory as a male mentor (the role filled by Uncle Oscar, who addresses Paul as “son,” and augmented by Bassett, a kind of surrogate older brother) but also a failure as a man. In a complete dismissal, he is described by Hester as one who is “very unlucky” and by the narrator as one “who never would be able to do anything worth doing.” Paul’s father works in “some office” and his only words in the text are “I don’t know,” spoken stonily, when Hester asks what Malabar means.
As Paul approaches adolescence, his evolving sense of himself as a young man has been severely distorted by the psychic distress he feels in his home, where the unspoken phrase “There must be more money” represents an animistic projection of the psychological condition of the family. The love that Paul desires and that his mother needs is unavailable in the traditional family fashion, leading Paul to undertake his desperate efforts to change the situation.
Lawrence had a degree of disdain for what is regarded as purely rational analysis and maintained a belief in a kind of mystic power in the universe. He expressed this attitude in Apocalypse, where he wrote “We ought to dance with rapture that we should be alive and in the flesh, and part of the living incarnate cosmos.” Paul’s rides on his rocking horse are both a literal and a symbolic version of this dance, as he attempts to join the flow of energy that will reveal the mysteries of the universe. Lawrence’s vivid descriptions of Paul’s rides have an autoerotic component, but they are much more than a youth’s distortions of emerging sexuality. Paul follows an instinctual aspect of his being, the “blood-consciousness” that Lawrence thought was a part of primal man, lost to the civilized citizens of England, and an element of male virility that could only be realized in a proper relationship with a woman. The fact that Paul’s demise is attributed to his need to “force” his horse to take him to “where there was luck” suggests the well-meant but misguided way that Paul seeks access to illumination. His death is a cautionary comment on the misdirection of the life force as a consequence of social constraints that Lawrence railed against throughout his writing life.
Summary: Rocking Horse Winner - DH Lawrence Priorities: Money vs. Family
Gambling has symbolic meaning too, as winnings are based on luck. The boy rides his rocking horse until he knows which horses to bet on for the upcoming races, and never loses. His mother keeps saying that she is unlucky, and that luck brings money, so Paul decides to help her because "[he is] a lucky person."
The mother keeps thinking about money and how she wants more of it, and she never pays attention to anything else. Not only does she not notice what is going around her, she doesn't really seem to care. As it says on page 446 of Literature and its Writers, "`I never told you, Mother, that if I can ride my horse, and get there, then I'm absolutely sure - oh absolutely! Mother, did I ever tell you? I am lucky!'
`No, you never did,' said the mother." Paul was awfully sick and was obviously dying, but the mother didn't really seem to notice or, to the matter, even care, and when he asked her a question, she answered coldly.
Furthermore, since she is so obsessed with money, when she gets a little, she wants even more (give her an inch, she grabs a mile). She doesn't appreciate the more important things in life such as her husband and kids, nature, all her belongings, and more to the point, life itself!
Money is corrupting the community since it has become the center of one's life.
In conclusion, how the mother acts towards her family, mainly her children, her lack of care and appreciation for her surroundings and obsession over getting more money proves that money has corrupted the community.
|This section contains 372 words|
(approx. 2 pages at 300 words per page)